ⵃⵎⵉⵎⵉ
🏆 Innovation Prize — Flotauto Paris 2025
Fleet Management · SaaS · B2B

DadyCar — Fleet Management Platform— Product Design Case Study

Product Designer · End-to-End UI/UX

DadyCar·2024–2025·Ongoing
DadyCar — Fleet Management Platform — Hero image

Context

Fleet management in and Europe has a serious tooling problem. The companies that could benefit most from a modern operations platform — mid-size businesses running 20 to 200 vehicles — are stuck between two bad options: expensive enterprise software built for corporations, or nothing at all. Before DadyCar, their day looked like this: maintenance reminders in a notebook, fuel expenses in a shared spreadsheet, driver assignments via phone calls, and zero visibility into what was actually happening across their fleet in real time. DadyCar was built to close that gap — one unified platform where a fleet manager can see everything, act on anything, and lose nothing.

My Role

Full end-to-end product design of a B2B SaaS fleet management platform — from design tokens and component library to every screen across the full operational surface.

1 PM1 PO2 Frontend Devs2 Backend Devs
"

Our primary user is a 40+ year old fleet manager, office-based, non-technical, spending 6–8 hours a day inside this dashboard. This single insight ruled out dark themes, high visual complexity, and anything that prioritized aesthetics over clarity.

— Core User Insight

Overview

Full end-to-end product design of a B2B SaaS fleet management platform — from design tokens and component library to every screen across the full operational surface.

Challenge

Fleet managers relied on Excel files and disconnected tools with no real-time visibility. The primary user is a 40+ year old, office-based, non-technical fleet manager spending 6–8 hours daily inside the dashboard — requiring clarity and speed above everything.

Solution

A light, data-focused dashboard built on a complete design system — design tokens, 60+ components, all states. Combined with progressive disclosure patterns to handle complex workflows without overwhelming non-technical users.

Design Challenges

Where the Hard Thinking Happened

01

Bulk Import — Designing for Error, Not Success

The Problem

Fleet managers needed to upload hundreds of vehicles at once via CSV or Excel — but their data was always messy: missing fields, wrong formats, duplicate entries. Early versions displayed the full imported table with all errors flagged inline. Pilot feedback was immediate: "I don't know where to start. There's too much."

The Solution

Progressive disclosure across 4 steps: Upload → Column Mapping → Error Review (only problematic rows) → Confirm Summary. Show users one decision at a time, not all their problems at once.

💡

Don't show users their problems all at once. Show them one decision at a time.

02

Roles & Permissions — Designing Invisible Complexity

The Problem

The platform needed a permissions system flexible enough for companies with very different org structures — some with one fleet manager, others with regional supervisors, field coordinators, and read-only executives — without making configuration feel like an IT task.

The Solution

A two-layer approach: predefined roles with sensible defaults for the majority of users, plus custom permission toggles per role for specific needs — designed as a clear scannable matrix. Every feature was also designed with its disabled and hidden state.

💡

Role-based access is completely invisible when it works well and completely broken when it doesn't.

03

Dashboard — What Does 'At a Glance' Actually Mean?

The Problem

A fleet management dashboard can display hundreds of data points. The real design question was: what does a fleet manager need to know in the first 10 seconds of their morning?

The Solution

Through sessions with pilot users we identified the true priority order: (1) Are any vehicles in a critical state? (2) What maintenance is due this week? (3) How are my costs trending? The dashboard was designed around this hierarchy.

💡

Hierarchy is not a visual decision — it is a user research decision.

Selected Screens

DadyCar — Fleet Management Platform — Screen 1
Screen 1
DadyCar — Fleet Management Platform — Screen 2
Screen 2
DadyCar — Fleet Management Platform — Screen 3
Screen 3
DadyCar — Fleet Management Platform — Screen 4
Screen 4
DadyCar — Fleet Management Platform — Screen 5
Screen 5

Impact & Results

What This Project Achieved

✦Won Innovation Prize at Flotauto Paris 2025 — competing against established European enterprise solutions
✦Validated by real fleet companies during pilot — their feedback directly shaped core features
✦Bulk import flow became the most praised feature among pilot users
✦Design system kept full platform consistent across a large operational surface
✦Permission system supported org structures from 1 manager to multi-regional teams

Learnings

What I'd Tell Myself at the Start

Design for your actual user, not for designers.

Every time I was tempted to make something visually clever, I asked: would a 45-year-old fleet manager find what they need here in 3 seconds?

The design system is the product, not just a support tool.

On a platform this large, consistency is a feature. The time invested in tokens and components upfront saved weeks of inconsistency fixes later.

The unsexy flows are often the most important ones.

Bulk import, document expiry reminders, permission configuration — none are headline features. All of them are what users actually spend their time in.

Winning an award is a milestone, not a finish line.

Pilot feedback is still coming in. The best version of DadyCar is still being designed.

Tools & Methods

FigmaFigJamNotionMazeTailwind CSSshadcn/ui

Next Project

FocusCare — Pre-Surgical Clinical Workflow Platform

View Project